Rossing v. United States Attorney General et al
| Duane B. Rossing |
| United States Attorney General and United States Department of Justice |
| 1:2022cv00024 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Plaintiff Duane B. Rossing (filing Civil Cover Sheet) (Eagle, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice. (eh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. To United States Dept. of Justice (Eagle, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. To Defendant Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Dept. of Justice (Eagle, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, filed by Duane B. Rossing (Filing Fee Paid, Receipt Number AOHSDC-8672544 $402.00). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Judgment Restoring Firearms Privileges) (Eagle, Thomas) Modified Docket Text to Include the Receipt Number to Show Payment on 1/13/2022 (bjc). |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
