Smallwood v. Collins et al
Plaintiff: Sherman Smallwood
Defendant: Terry Collins, Gary Croft, Harry Hageman and Marc Dann
Case Number: 2:2008cv00679
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER denying 61 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Judgment. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/05/2010. (dh1)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 09/08/2010. This case is closed. (dh)
May 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Second Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 5/20/2010. (kk2)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER. The Opinion and Order # 32 is VACATED. Defendant Janes is therefore DIRECTED to provide answers under oath to plaintiff's interrogatories and signed answers to his requests for admission within 7 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 07/31/2009. (sr)
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 28 Discovery is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/21/2009. (er1 )
March 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/06/09. (dh)
January 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER adopting and affirming the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Signed by Edmund A Sargus on 01/13/2009. (dh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smallwood v. Collins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherman Smallwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Croft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harry Hageman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marc Dann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?