Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
David W. Sconce v. Daniel Paramo et al
as 2:2015cv07744
Respondent:
Harry Hageman, Daniel Paramo and Richard J Donovan Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
David W. Sconce
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sconce v. Paramo et al
as 5:2015cv00262
Petitioner:
David W. Sconce
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and Harry Hageman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sconce v. Paramo et al
as 3:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
David W. Sconce
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Harry Hageman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dwayne Harris v. Harry Hageman, et al
as 11-4288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY HAGEMAN and CYNTHIA MAUSSER
Getsinger v. Hageman et al
as 3:2011cv03047
Petitioner:
Charles R. Getsinger
Respondent:
Harry Hageman and JAMES T. PLOUSIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Getsinger v. Hageman et al
as 5:2011cv01143
Petitioner:
Charles R. Getsinger
Respondent:
Harry Hageman and James T. Plousis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daba v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
Fikru K. Daba
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Jim Karnes, Stephan L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Ridenour v. Terry Collins, et al
as 10-3233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. RIDENOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY J. COLLINS, Warden, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, In His Official Capacity, GARY CROFT, Warden, Chief, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, In His Official Capacity, HARRY HAGEMAN, Chairperson, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, In His Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
