Bruggerman v. Collins et al
| Christopher R Bruggerman |
| Terry Collins, Harry Hageman, Cynthia Mausser, Jim Bedra, Bobby Bogan, Kathleen Kovah, Sandra Mack, Robert Maszczynski, Fritz Rauschenberg and Ellen Venters |
| 2:2009cv00381 |
| May 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| John D. Holschuh |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying 61 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Christopher R Bruggeman. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C Economus on 4/28/11. (jr1)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Defendants and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C. Economus. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
45
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 8/9/2010. (kjm1)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery & denying 27 Motion in camera inspection of certain requested discovery & denying 28 Motion for Hearing. Discovery shall be completed by 5/28/2010 & dispositive motions due by 6/30/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 4/7/2010. (kjm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
