Gore v. AT&T Corp et al
| Heather Gore |
| AT&T Corp, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Philip Dun, Jacklyn Reese, John Doe, John Roe, Company XYZ and Company ABC |
| 2:2009cv00854 |
| September 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Norah McCann King |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER denying 71 Defendants AT&T Corp., AT&T, Inc., and American Telephone and Telegraph Company's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/29/2011. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER denying 89 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 09/14/2010. (dh)
|
|
Filing
84
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 08/06/2010. This case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for Franklin County, Ohio. (dh)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 02/11/2010. (sr)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER vacating 25 Stipulated Protective Order which was entered by the Court in error. The parties are directed to comply with the Magistrate Judge's Order to present a revised proposed protective order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 02/08/2010. (dh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
