Cases 1 - 10 of 974
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wetumpka Water Works and Sewer Board v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Wetumpka Water Works and Sewer Board
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC and Star Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Chaumont v. AT&T CORP.
as 1:2024cv21110
Plaintiff:
Vance Chaumont
Defendant:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baah v. AT and T West et al
as 8:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Alex Baah
Defendant:
AT and T West, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT and T Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Woodbury Wireless LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Woodbury Wireless LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T MOBILITY LLC II and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
