Rutherford v. Lamneck et al
| Kenneth Rutherford |
| Ginny Lamneck, Rhonda Richard, Ukokpan Eshett, George Smith, Robin Muntz, Charlotte Jenkins, Matthew Church, Sam Cheadle, Mark Fisher, J. Spezzalli, Shannon Hill, George Bruce and Julie Cheadle |
| 2:2009cv00914 |
| October 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| WARREN |
| James L Graham |
| Norah McCann King |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER adopting report and recommendation re 49 . Motion for summary judgment re 46 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 6/6/12. (rew )
|
|
Filing
49
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS the following: 1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Fisher and Spezzalli be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the PLRA' s exhaustion requirements; 2) Plaintiff's state-law assault and battery claims be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; 3) The remainder of Defendant's Motion be DENIED, such that Plaintiff may proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendant Cheadle. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 5/7/2012. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
