Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Telecom Fiber, LLC v. Mulroney et al
as 1:2020cv03907
Defendant:
Jared Redmond Charles, Ernest Jacob Crowe, George Bruce Mulroney and others
Plaintiff:
Telecom Fiber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06675
Plaintiff:
George Bruce
Defendant:
City of New York, Alan Avella, Curtis Cato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. State of Missouri
as 4:2014cv00577
Petitioner:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Nelson, II v. Joplin City Police Officer, et al
as 14-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Defendant:
Joplin City Police Officer, Joplin City Jailer 1, Joplin City Jailer 2 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Simeon Burchfirld and Luann Leighton
Nelson v. State of Missouri et al
as 3:2014cv05011
Plaintiff:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Dean Dankelson, Richard Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2013cv00892
Plaintiff:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health and Rob Hornstra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Jasper County Jail
as 3:2013cv05122
Plaintiff:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Joplin City Police Officer et al
as 3:2013cv05038
Plaintiff:
George Bruce Nelson, II
Defendant:
Joplin City Police Officer, Joplin City Jailer 1 and Joplin City Jailer 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rutherford v. Lamneck et al
as 1:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rutherford
Defendant:
Ginny Lamneck, Rhonda Richard, Ukokpan Eshett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
