Leonard v. Mohr et al
| Ronald D. Leonard |
| John Doe, Ernie Moore, William Eleby, Robin Knab, Arledge, Theresa McGill, Gary Mohr, Smith, Branhan and Rob Jeffreys |
| 2:2011cv00152 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 03/20/2012 for the Defendants. This case is closed. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Robin Knab, Arledge, Rob Jeffreys, William Eleby, Gary Mohr, Smith, Theresa McGill, Branhan be GRANTED; 28 MOTION Second Request For Protective Custody Transfe r filed by Ronald D. Leonard ( Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2012) be DENIED, Motions terminated: 43 MOTION to Strike "is DENIED"; 41 MOTION for Order to Supplement to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39 filed by Ronald D. Leonard, 41 MOTION for Order to Supplement to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39) "is DENIED", 38 MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Ronald D. Leonard "is terminated", 46 MOTION to Strike 44 Supplemental - Supporting (non motion) "is DENIED". Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 2/9/12. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER MODIFYING 4 the Magistrate Judge's initial screening Report and Recommendation, dismissing the complaint to the extent it purports to state a claim for deprivation of Plaintiff's constitutional right to due process and a mending the complaint by the factual allegations and First Amendment retaliation claim in his objections. Each defendant is ORDERED to answer or respond to the complaint within 45 days of being served with a copy of the complaint and summons. Also, Defendants are ORDERED to respond to Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction at the same time they respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/11/2011. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
