Ruff-El v. Nicholas Financial Inc. et al
| Gerry Ruff-El |
| Gregory Green, Joshua S. Daugherty, Lisa M. Ickes, Austin C. Summers, Matt E. Harris, Nicholas Financial Inc., Peter L. Vosotas, Todd Stonewall, Columbus Police Department, Walter L. Distelzweig, Travis D. Fisher, Larry E. Ferguson, John A. Sullivan and Gregory Swartz |
| 2:2011cv00618 |
| July 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Peter C Economus |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER granting 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. All federal-law based claims are dismissed w/prejudice. The state law claims are dismissed w/out prejudice. All other pending motions (# 72 , # 73 , # 75 & # 86 ) are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 10/1/2012. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Jury Trial; granting 26 Motion to Quash Supboena; granting 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings w/respect to plaintiff's claims under 42 USC §1985 and 18 USC §§2242 & 1652 and denying 31 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff's response re 50 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order due w/in seven (7) days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 3/14/2012. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 1/26/12. (jcw1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
