Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Gregory Green v. Jimmy Richardson, II
as 24-6379
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Defendant:
JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II, Fifteenth Circuit Solicitor and MICHAEL TRAVIS HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County
Green v. Richardson et al
as 4:2023cv06103
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Jimmy A. Richardson, II and Michael Travis Hyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Green v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Jerry Bradshaw, Jared Self, Amber N Corlis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Greene, Jr. v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, et al
as 22-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GREENE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Gregory Green v. Donald Beckwith
as 22-6157
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY GREEN
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD BECKWITH, Warden
Green v. Horry, South Carolina, County of
as 4:2021cv01876
Defendant:
Horry, County of and Horry, South Carolina, County of
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13650
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Green v. Travis Hyman
as 21-6429
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFREDO MORTELL, Warden, Manning Correctional Institution, BRYAN STERLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, TRAVIS M. HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GREEN
Green v. Gulick
as 4:2021cv04022
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Stephen Gulick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07356
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
