Freeman v. Mohr et al
| Dwight Freeman |
| Gary C Mohr, Eddy, Krisher, Escobar, Lapushansky and John Does |
| 2:2011cv00878 |
| October 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Gregory L Frost |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 in that the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED and Plaintiff is required to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to pay the entire filing fee within thirty days of this order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 2/5/13. (sem1)
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 9 MOTION to Compel Payment of Full Filing Fees and for Related Relief Under the Three Strikes Provision of The PLRA be granted & that Mr. Freeman be required to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee. It is further recommended that if Mr. Freeman fails to pay the entire filing fee w/in thirty (30) days of an order adopting this R&R that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and that Mr. Freeman still be assessed the $350.00 filing fee. Objections due by w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 10/30/2012. (kk2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
