Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,098
Escobar Larin v. Garland
as 24-1428
Petitioner: JOSE RODOLFO ESCOBAR LARIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03419
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Escobar-Argueta v. Garland
as 24-1081
Petitioner: BRYAN ESCOBAR-ARGUETA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff: Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant: John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Escobar v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02964
Plaintiff: Jacqueline C Escobar
Defendant: A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and David Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
MT. Hawley Insurance Company v. Armas et al
as 4:2024cv01458
Plaintiff: MT. Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant: Daniel Armas, Claudia Alonso Lopez and Cesar Luis Escobar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?