Bostic Senior v. Davis et al
| Teddy Glen Bostic Senior |
| Jeanette Arlene Davis, The Columbus Police of the City of Columbus, Kimberly Jacobs, Ernest Rice and Unknown Columbus Police Officers |
| 2:2015cv03029 |
| November 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Gregory L. Frost |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendants' 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 3/5/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 40 Motion to Vacate ; denying 43 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/6/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Defendant Davis is dismissed as a party to this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 5/8/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 5/8/2017 (agm).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Strike. The Court hereby ORDERS stricken all allegations in the Amended Complaint pertaining to Daviss sexual or romantic history and Plaintiffs time-barred claims. Plaintiff is also ORDERED to refile an amended complaint within 14 DAYS of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/1/2017. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations. DISMISSING Plaintiffs claims from August, 2011 and UPHOLDING Plaintiffs claim from November, 2015. The Clerk is DIRECTED to order service of process on Defendants with respect to the November, 2015 claim. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/17/2016. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that all of the claims in 4 Amended Complaint arising out of occurrences from August, 2011 be dismissed as time-barred, but that the Court order service of process to be made with respect to the November, 2015 incident. Objections to R&R due by 5/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 4/28/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER finding as moot 3 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 4/19/16. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 2 Complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2) with leave to amend. Objections to R&R due by 3/17/2016. The Court grants 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 2/29/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
