Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jacobs v. Casey's Marketing Co., et al
as 4:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jacobs
Defendant:
Casey's Marketing Co. doing business as Casey's and Casey's Services Company doing business as Casey's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jacobs-Talamantez v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jacobs-Talamantez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wes Sorrell v. Joseph Echenrode, et al
as 19-4069
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH, JOHN AND JANE DOE, Columbus Division of Police, JOSEPH ECHENRODE, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WES SORRELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobs et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jacobs and Dave Jacobs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teddy Bostic, Sr. v. Jeanette Davis, et al
as 17-3597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY GLEN BOSTIC, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANETTE ARLENE DAVIS, COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, COLUMBUS POLICE CHIEF KIMBERLY JACOBS and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN COLUMBUS POLICE OFFICERS
v. Croft et al
as 2:2017cv00397
Defendant:
Marcus Croft, City of Columbus, Derek Blaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Croft et al
as 2:2017oe00397
Defendant:
Marcus Croft, City of Columbus, Derek Blaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Croft v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Marcus Croft
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Derek Blaine, Shawn Gruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards et al v. Axiall Corp
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Judy Edwards , Kelsey Ellzey , Sheila Evans and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
