Hendricks v. Mohr et al
Benjamin Hendricks |
Gary Mohr, Andrew Eddy, John Gardner and John/Jane Doe x50 |
2:2015cv03130 |
October 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
James L. Graham |
Terence P. Kemp |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER granting 83 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 88 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; adopting Report and Recommendations re 89 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 2/21/2019. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 89 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Andrew Eddy, Anthony Ayres, Arthur Hale, John Gardner, 22 Complaint filed by Benjamin Hendricks. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Ju dgment be GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/10/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and adopting the 44 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 7/14/17. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Stuart Hudson, Gary Mohr, Andrew Eddy, Anthony Ayres, Arthur Hale and John Gardner in that it is RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 5/31/17. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER granting 1 MOTION to Reopen Case, construed as the filing of a new action (2:15-cv-3130-JLG-TPK). Plaintiff shall file a complaint under the new case number within thirty (30) days. (See 2:12-cv-729-MHW-TPK for original case). Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 3/15/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 3/15/2016 (agm). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.