Moore v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Moore v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Moore v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Plaintiff:	Chad A. Moore
Defendant:	Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2018cv00379
Filed:	April 24, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	LICKING
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge:	Algenon L. Marbley
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2018	Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 7 Motion to Dismiss. This action is dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/30/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 23, 2018	Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss this action without prejudice as unexhausted be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED unless Petitioner notifies the Court, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, that he wishes to delete his unexhausted claims and proceed solely on his remaining exhausted claim of the denial of the effective assistance of counsel. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 23, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2018

Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 7 Motion to Dismiss. This action is dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/30/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

October 23, 2018

Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss this action without prejudice as unexhausted be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED unless Petitioner notifies the Court, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, that he wishes to delete his unexhausted claims and proceed solely on his remaining exhausted claim of the denial of the effective assistance of counsel. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 23, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad A. Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Hilda Rosenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?