Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moore v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Moore
Defendant:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billett v. Moore et al
as 1:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Billett
Defendant:
Chad Scott Moore and Torri Lynn Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHLUETER v. MATNEY et al
as 1:2017cv01001
Defendant:
TOBY M. COMBEST, TYSON MATNEY and CHAD A. MOORE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS SCHLUETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Central Ohio Drug Enforcement Task Force (Code TF) et al
as 2:2016cv00987
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Moore
Defendant:
Central Ohio Drug Enforcement Task Force (Code TF), Kyle Boerstler, Greg Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Kufahl, et al
as 16-3289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ERIN GRAY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TROOPER RYAN KUFAHL, in his official and individual capacities, TROOPER SHAWN TAYLOR, in his official and individual capacities, TROOPER PATRICK MCCORMICK, in his official and individual capacities and others
Moore v. Licking County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Moore
Defendant:
K. Boerstler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wedgeworth v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
William Stephens, Edgar D Baker, Jr, Lisa Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore #217127 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02162
Petitioner:
Chad E Moore
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Rapelje
as 2:2014cv10357
Plaintiff:
Chad Michael Moore
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore #524853 v. Rapelje
as 1:2014cv00017
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Moore #524853
Respondent:
Lloyd Rapelje
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
