35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd. v. United States Of America
35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd. |
United States Of America |
2:2022cv02684 |
July 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Michael H Watson |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Internal Revenue Service on 7/11/2022, filed by Plaintiff 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Receipts, #2 Exhibit B - USPS Tracking IRS, #3 Exhibit C - USPS Tracking Attorney General, #4 Exhibit D - USPS Tracking US Attorney) (Smith, Derek) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant United States Of America. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return as to U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio) (Smith, Derek) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant United States Of America. United States Of America served on 7/11/2022, answer due 9/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return as to Attorney General, #2 Certified Mail Receipt Attorney General, Internal Revenue Service, and U.S. Attorney) (Smith, Derek) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to United States Of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Internal Revenue Service, #2 Summons Form AG Garland) (tla) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #2 and #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Lawrence M. Hill and Caitlin R. Tharp as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel are directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. By Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 07/05/2022. (tla) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8938768) of Caitlin R. Tharp by Plaintiff 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Smith, Derek) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8938767) of Lawrence M. Hill by Plaintiff 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Smith, Derek) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Of America ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8938756), filed by 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form) (Smith, Derek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd. v. United States Of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: 35 N. Fourth Street, Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Derek C Smith |
Represented By: | Caitlin R Tharp |
Represented By: | Lawrence M Hill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.