Morris Sr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex et al
Leon A. Morris Sr. |
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex, L. Shuler, R. West, Amber Ablefinlin, Unit Manager, Sgt. Booker and Jones |
2:2022cv03461 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Karen L Litkovitz |
Edmund A Sargus |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Defendants. (kh) |
Filing 13 Complaint Made Clear, filed by Leon A. Morris Sr. (kh) Modified filing date on 11/2/2022 (kh). |
Filing 12 Supporting Evidence by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr. (kh) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jones, filed by Leon A. Morris Sr. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Envelope) (kh) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement) (kh) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Obtain Public Information per F.O.I.A Public Records Request. Ohio Code 2743.02 by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff, Leon A. Morris Sr. (bjr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Return Funds Unlawfully Deducted from my Inmate Trust Account by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Leon A. Morris Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Forms, #2 Envelope 2 of 4, #3 Envelope 3 of 4) (daf) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER - Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay $402 ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee), or submit to the Court an in forma pauperis application and certified copy of plaintiffs prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prior six-month period within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 09/28/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER - Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1, the Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division at Columbus, for all further proceedings. Upon transfer to the Columbus location of Court, the case shall remain with the undersigned Magistrate Judge with a resident District Court Judge of the Columbus location to be assigned.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/20/2022. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Case transferred in from Western Division at Dayton on 09/20/2022, Case Number 3:22-cv-267. Case assigned to Judge Edmund A. Sargus. (kh) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff, Leon A. Morris Sr. (bjr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Leon A. Morris Sr. (FILING FEE DUE) (Attachments: #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form) #4 Exhibits, #5 Inmate Demand Statement) (bjr). Modified attachments on 9/22/2022 to separate Inmate Demand Statement from Complaint Exhibits. (bjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.