Martin v. Shoop et al
| Howard E. Martin, III |
| Tim Shoop, Corby Free and Clark Goble |
| 2:2023cv02358 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| James L Graham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Verified Complaint for Combined MOTION in Favor of Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preventive Injunction and Affidavit in Support by Plaintiff Howard E. Martin, III. (kh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Howard E. Martin, III. (kh) |
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER - re #1 Complaint filed by Howard E. Martin, III. Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay $402 ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee) or submit to the Court a properly supported in forma pauperis application and affidavit within thirty days of the date of this Deficiency Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this case for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 8/7/2023. (bjr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corby Free, Clark Goble, Tim Shoop, filed by Howard E. Martin, III. (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
