Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Rutherford v. Free et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clinton Rutherford
Defendant:
Corby Free, Ashley Marsh, Lt. Jhones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Shoop et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III
Defendant:
Tim Shoop, Corby Free and Clark Goble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Trostel et al
as 2:2023cv02314
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cook
Defendant:
Katie Trostel, Joshua Neff, Corby Free and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Chaplain Alfred Marcus, Inspector Corby Free and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodgrass v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03604
Plaintiff:
Marwan Snodgrass
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Corby Free and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Pettit et al
as 2:2020cv01074
Defendant:
Corby Free, Deanna Pettit, Antonio Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Damon S. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Blevins v. Rebecca Casto, et al
as 19-3490
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden, REBECCA CASTO, CORBY FREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. BLEVINS
Stone v. Collier et al
as 2:2019cv00401
Defendant:
Corby Free, Jonathan Schob, Tim Shoop and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr R. Stone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grove v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) et al
as 2:2018cv01492
Defendant:
Ms Bottorff, MD Abid I Rana, John Doe (X-50) and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Grove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv02315
Defendant:
Warden Tim Shoop, Corby Free, Jonathan Schob and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr R. Stone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
