Hassan v. Garland et al
| Mohamed Abduhakim Hassan |
| Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Kimberly Adams |
| 2:2023cv02367 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H Watson |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Mohamed Abduhakim Hassan. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Flecha, Crucita) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint, filed by Mohamed Abduhakim Hassan, and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint, filed by Mohamed Abduhakim Hassan as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 7/27/2023. (mas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9522143), filed by Mohamed Abduhakim Hassan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons) (Flecha, Crucita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
