Davis et al v. GCS Water Purification, LLC et al
Matthew Davis and Jeanette Davis |
GCS Water Purification, LLC, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Sterling Process Equipment & Services, Inc. and Keurig Dr Pepper Holdings Inc. |
2:2023cv03516 |
October 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
James L Graham |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned as to Defendants GCS Water Purification LLC & Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., served by Counsel. (GCS Water Purification, LLC served on 12/4/2023 Answer due 12/26/2023); (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. served on 12/6/2023 Answer due 12/27/2023). (vb) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned as to Defendant Keurig Dr Pepper Holdings Inc. served on 12/7/2023, per USPS tracking number by counsel. Answer due 12/28/2023. (vb) Modified on 12/11/2023 (vb). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to GCS Water Purification, LLC, Keurig Dr Pepper Holdings Inc., Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Sterling Process Equipment & Services, Inc. (jlk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9657224), filed by Matthew Davis, Jeanette Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons GCS Water, #3 Summons Form Summons Keurig, #4 Summons Form Summons Keuirig Holdings, #5 Summons Form Summons Sterling) (Bosak, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.