Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Davis v. King et al
as 9:2026cv00548
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Alisha King, Austin J. Swindle, B. Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. King et al Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.
as 4:2026cv05831
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Alisha King, Austin J. Swindle, B. Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Vila
as 4:2026cv05721
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Liliana G Vila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Rigsby
as 4:2026cv05104
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Bobby D. Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skelly v. Hughes et al
as 1:2026cv01250
Plaintiff:
Mason Skelly
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Centurion, Kashelle .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Stephen v. Kallas, Kevin et al
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Kallas, Greg Van Rybroek, Dawn Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv00936
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Scott Smith and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Polunsky Unit et al
as 4:2026cv03548
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Polunsky Unit and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Smith et al
as 4:2026cv02460
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin B Smith and Vannessa M. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Stephen v. Laetsch, Kevin et al
as 3:2026cv00183
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Laetsch, Javon Alyasiri, Greg Van Rybroek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
