Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
Phillip A. Lawson |
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods, Wanza Mitchell-Jackson, Issac Bullock, Sgt. J. Maggard, Steven Williams, Rodney Macintosh, Case Manager Kearns, Captain David Agee, Captain Jason Back, Lt. Tim Tatman, Sandman, C.O Koch, C.O John Wells, C.O Ms. Sedlitz, Meredyth McLaughlin, Sky Murray, Rachel Allen, C.O Ms. Kimberly Panunzio, Deputy Douglas Luneke, C.O Fredrick Epperson, C.O Larry Farmer, Lt. Kayla Stebelton and Deputy Warden Robert Welch |
2:2023cv03985 |
November 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Algenon L Marbley |
Sarah D Morrison |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Phillip A. Lawson. (kh) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to provide service copies of the Complaint so that service may be issued on Defendants. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff, within 30 days of the date of this Order, submit a copy of the Complaint for each Defendant named in the Complaint and against whom he seeks to proceed in this action. Before service is issued upon Defendant Jane/John Doe Aramark Supervisor, Plaintiff must file a motion to issue service setting forth the identity of the unidentified Defendant. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file a Motion to issue service, including USM & Summons forms, if and when Plaintiff discovers the identity of the unnamed Defendant through discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/21/2023. (vb) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification). |
Set Deadline: Plaintiff's Response due by 1/20/2024. (vb) |
Filing 6 ORDER - Re #5 Complaint filed by Phillip A. Lawson. It is ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon defendants as directed by plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on December 12, 2023. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Phillip A. Lawson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (jlk) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on December 12, 2023. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:22-cv-4420 ARE related. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 12/8/23. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Phillip A. Lawson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint - Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Form, #5 USM Form, #6 Envelope) (mve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.