Sharpe v. City of Springfield, Ohio et al
| Jeffrey Sharpe |
| City of Springfield, Ohio, Clark County, Ohio, Gerald Scott Woodruf, Harrington, Turner, Lopez, Daniel Driscoll, Douglas Rastatter, McCoy, Donovan, Jacobs, Jeffrey Steinmetz, Nathaniel Smoot, Douglas Estep, John Does 1 - 5 and Mark Parsons |
| 3:2010cv00027 |
| January 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 5 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; OVERRULING SHARPE'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 8 ); DISMISSING SHARPE'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING LEAVE FOR SHARPE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/26/10. (bac1)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. OBJECTIONS TO R&R DUE BY 3/12/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 2/23/10. (bac1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
