Boyce et al v. City Hall for Springfield Ohio et al
Shaqueeta Terrell, Ramon Boyce, Alyshia Cook and Quiana Boyce |
Brian T Peabody, David Andrew Wilson, City Hall for Springfield Ohio, Stephen Moody, Clark County Sheriff's Department, Brian Melchi, Ronny Fader, Lee Graf, Deborah K Burchett, Springfield City Police Department, Ronald Terry, Michael Curtis and Deric Nichols |
3:2019cv00181 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael J Newman |
Walter H Rice |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 . Mail sent to Shaqueeta Terrell. (kma) |
NOTATION ORDER: In light of the filing of Plaintiffs' amended complaint (doc. #7 ), the undersigned's previously filed Report and Recommendation (doc. #5 ) is VACATED. This case shall proceed on Plaintiffs' amended complaint (doc. #7 ). The Clerk shall, however, hold service pending an initial review by the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/5/2019. (dm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Ramon Boyce. (er) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Alyshia Cook, Ramon Boyce, Shaqueeta Terrell and Quiana Boyce against Deborah K Burchett, City Hall for Springfield Ohio, Clark County Sheriff's Department, Michael Curtis, Ronny Fader, Lee Graf, Brian Melchi, Stephen Moody, Deric Nichols, Brian T Peabody, Springfield City Police Department, Ronald Terry and David Andrew Wilson. (er) |
Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiffs Quiana Boyce, Alyshia Cook and Shaqueeta Terrell. (er) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT THE COMPLAINT: (1) BE STRICKEN AS TO PLAINTIFFS ALYSHIA COOK, SHAQUEETA TERRELL, AND QUIANA BOYCE; AND (2) REMAIN PENDING AS TO PLAINTIFF RAMON BOYCE. (Objections to R&R due by 8/12/2019). *** ORDER THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS ISSUE BY THE U.S. MARSHAL, ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER, WITH REGARD TO CLAIMS ASSERTED BY PLAINTIFF RAMON BOYCE ONLY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 7/26/2019. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Alyshia Cook. (er) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Ramon Boyce, Alyshia Cook, Shaqueeta Terrell, Quiana Boyce. (srb) |
Filing 2 ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFF RAMON BOYCES MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. #1 ); (2) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEPARATELY FILE THE COMPLAINT; (3) ORDERING THAT THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL HOLD SERVICE OF PROCESS PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT; (4) ORDERING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT COMPLYING WITH RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 6/24/2019. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Ramon Boyce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Affidavit, #4 Summons Form and USM 285 Forms) (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.