Cases
Ramon Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 24-3363
Petitioner: RAMON BOYCE
Respondent: WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Ramon Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 23-3996
Petitioner / Appellant: RAMON BOYCE
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03240
Petitioner: Ramon Boyce
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramon Boyce v. City Hall for Springfield, OH, et al
as 23-3533
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAMON BOYCE
Defendant / Appellee: CITY HALL FOR SPRINGFIELD, OH, DAVID ANDREW WILSON, Senior Policy Advisor/Criminal Justice, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Giles et al v. Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff: David Giles, Morgan Brey, Matt Dotson and others
Defendant: Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC and MARK MINTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00216
Petitioner: Ramon Boyce
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyce et al v. City Hall for Springfield Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00181
Defendant: Brian T Peabody, David Andrew Wilson, City Hall for Springfield Ohio and others
Plaintiff: Shaqueeta Terrell, Ramon Boyce, Alyshia Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Warden London Correctional Insitution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00285
Petitioner: Ramon Boyce
Respondent: Warden London Correctional Insitution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?