Cummings v. Teston et al
| Paul Cummings |
| CEO Robert Teston and Farm Credit of Florida |
| 3:2021cv00097 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #1 ); (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 1-2) PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B); AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 5/12/2021. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| NOTICE: Counsel is advised to review and become familiar with Judge Michael J. Newman's # Standing Order Governing Civil Cases. This Order replaces General Order No. 1201 Dayton in all civil cases before Judge Newman (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Paul Cummings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Affidavit Affidavit to Complaint, #4 Summons Form, #5 USM 285 Forms) (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
