Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cummings v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01728
Petitioner:
Ryan Paul Cummings
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Teston et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
CEO Robert Teston and Farm Credit of Florida
Plaintiff:
Paul Cummings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Kermit Alexander, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70232
Undetermined:
KEVIN COOPER, KERMIT ALEXANDER, RAYNARD PAUL CUMMINGS and others
Other:
BRADLEY WINCHELL and In re: KERMIT ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
IN THE MATTER OF PAUL CUMMINGS et al
as 1:2018cv01846
In Re:
PAUL CUMMINGS and THERESA CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cummings et al v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2018cv01650
Plaintiff:
Theresa Cummings and Paul Cummings
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CUMMING et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
PAUL CUMMING and J NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv22794
Plaintiff:
Paul Cummings and Theresa Cummings
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Loretta E. Lynch, Office of Governor Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PELLETIER v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID R PELLETIER
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ESPOSITO
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INMAN v. CUMMING et al
as 2:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
FRANK INMAN
Defendant:
PAUL CUMMING and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
