Esrati v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
Plaintiff: David Esrati
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Case Number: 3:2021cv00218
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Referring Judge: Peter B Silvain
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice. (Horwitz, Matthew)
October 7, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant U.S. Department of Justice. (Horwitz, Matthew)
October 7, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE by Defendant U.S. Department of Justice of Filing of Declaration (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Theodore B. Smith) (Horwitz, Matthew)
October 1, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION for reversal of decision to deny pro -se Litigant access electronic filing using the PACER system. (Entitled Plaintiff's Appeal of PACER E-File Deniel) re 9/17/21 NOTATION ORDER denying #11 Plaintiff's Request to E-file. by Plaintiff David Esrati. (pb)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER granting #9 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Plead. Defendants shall answer, move, or plead in response to Plaintiff Complaint (Doc. #1 ) by 10/11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. on 9/17/2021. (lk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 17, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: All Defendants' answer due 10/11/2021. (lk)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER denying #11 Plaintiff's Request to E-file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. on 9/17/2021. (lk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 16, 2021 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 10/11/2021. filed by Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice. (Horwitz, Matthew)
September 15, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION request to E-file by Plaintiff David Esrati. (pb)
September 14, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 10/11/2021. filed by Plaintiff David Esrati. (pb)
September 14, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 10/11/2021. by Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice. (Horwitz, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE - 1. Parties are not permitted to have ex-parte communications with the Court. This means that you cannot communicate with the Court about the merits of your case, orally or in writing, without the other partys participation. 2. You must tell the Court and the other partys attorney, in writing, of changes to your address and/or telephone number. 3. Because pro se litigants do not have access to the Courts electronic filing system, they are required to mail a copy of anything they file with the Court to the other party's attorney and enclose a signed Certificate of Service. This requirement can be avoided if: (1) the pro se litigant personally brings the filing to the Clerk of Courts office for filing; (2) the attorney(s) for the other party agree to receive service solely through the Court's CM/ECF filing system; and (3) the Certificate of Service in the pro se litigants filing states that service will be made solely through the Courts CM/ECF filing system and counsel for the opposing party has so consented. 4. Pro se litigants are encouraged to read the Court's Guide for Pro Se Civil Litigants, which can be found at http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/pro-sehandbook. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/31/21. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 27, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigations served on 8/12/2021, answer due 10/12/2021; U.S. Department of Justice served on 8/19/2021, answer due 10/18/2021. (pb)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 3:19-cv-251 are NOT related. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/16/21. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 13, 2021 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 300DAY025247 (pb)
August 11, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant U.S. Attorney Department of Justice served on 8/11/2021, answer due 10/13/2021. Plaintiff insist the service is adequate via residential service by placing service under the door of the U.S. Attorney's Office, 200 W. Second Street, Room 602, Dayton, Ohio 45402 (pb)
August 10, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney (pb)
August 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice, filed by David Esrati. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Esrati v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Esrati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Horwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigations
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Horwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?