Thomas v. Harder et al
| Paul Thomas |
| Kathleen Harder, Saurabh Gupta, Erin Cramer, Robert Cahn, James Lace, Charlotte Lin, Patti Louie, Jennifer Lyons, Ali Mageehon, Chere Pereira, Chris Poulsen, Andrew Schink, Jill Shaw, Anthony Domenigoni, Paula Lee-Valkov, Rick Goldstein, Eric Brown, Jason Boemmels and David Farris |
| 3:2022cv00944 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Reply to Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support #6 . Filed by Jason Boemmels, Eric Brown, Robert Cahn, Erin Cramer, David Farris, Saurabh Gupta, Kathleen Harder, James Lace, Charlotte Lin, Patti Louie, Jennifer Lyons, Ali Mageehon, Chere Pereira, Chris Poulsen, Andrew Schink, Jill Shaw. (Abrams, Marc) |
Filing 9
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Any requests for oral argument concerning Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint #6 will be considered in due course. Should the Court deem the motion appropriate for disposition with oral argument upon review of the briefings, the motion will be scheduled accordingly. (gm)
|
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support #6 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Paul Thomas. (Joncus, Stephen) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Setting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint #6 on the under advisement calendar of 9/12/2022. Defendants' earlier Motion to Dismiss (Original) Complaint #3 is Denied as Moot. (gm)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support. Filed by Ali Mageehon, David Farris, James Lace, Paula Lee-Valkov, Chris Poulsen, Robert Cahn, Kathleen Harder, Patti Louie, Chere Pereira, Jill Shaw, Jason Boemmels, Andrew Schink, Charlotte Lin, Saurabh Gupta, Eric Brown, Jennifer Lyons, Erin Cramer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.) (Abrams, Marc) |
| Filing 5 Amended Complaint . Filed by Paul Thomas against Jason Boemmels, Eric Brown, Robert Cahn, Erin Cramer, David Farris, Saurabh Gupta, Kathleen Harder, James Lace, Charlotte Lin, Patti Louie, Jennifer Lyons, Ali Mageehon, Chere Pereira, Chris Poulsen, Andrew Schink, Jill Shaw. (Joncus, Stephen) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Setting Defendants' Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss #3 on the under advisement calendar of 8/15/2022. (gm)
|
| Filing 3 Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support. Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Abrams, Marc) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/28/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/28/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 11/28/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (ecp)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8571666 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Paul Thomas against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet). (Joncus, Stephen) (Comlaint PDF replaced on 7/1/2022 with corrected PDF.) (eo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
