Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Lance White v. Paul Thomas
as 24-5017
Petitioner:
LANCE WHITE
Defendant:
PAUL THOMAS, Gibson County Sheriff
Meadows et al v. Leeds, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Frank Meadows and Quinton Leroy Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Leeds, City of, Thomas William McDonald, McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calamari v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv09788
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Calamari
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
PAUL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rees v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00313
Petitioner:
Paul Thomas Rees
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moralez v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02529
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Moralez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Paul Thomas v. Kathleen Harder, et al
as 23-35456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN HARDER, MD, SAURABH GUPTA, MD, ERIN CRAMER, PA-C and others
Shaw v. Pickle et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
Ann Pickle, Mitchell Newman, Debbie Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
