Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Steven LaTulippe
Defendant:
Oregon Medical Board, Kathleen Harder, Ali Mageehon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22987
Plaintiff:
DAVID FARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul Thomas v. Kathleen Harder, et al
as 23-35456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN HARDER, MD, SAURABH GUPTA, MD, ERIN CRAMER, PA-C and others
Farris v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv14182
Plaintiff:
David Farris
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Harder et al
as 3:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas
Defendant:
Kathleen Harder, Saurabh Gupta, Erin Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zywicki v. Washington et al
as 1:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Todd Zywicki and Professor Todd Zywicki
Defendant:
Gregory G Washington, James Hazel, Horace Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00589
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stohr et al v. Scharer et al
as 6:2017cv01018
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stohr , Bradley Stohr , Matthew Stohr and others
Defendant:
Peter Scharer , Shawnee Scharer and David Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farris v. Astrue
as 4:2008cv00733
Plaintiff:
David Farris
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
