BALLARD v. WILLIAMS et al
| Todd Darrell Ballard |
| Williams, Martin, Fulton, Stockholm, Jane Doe, Linda Diebert, Coleen Newfield, John A. Palakovich, Phil Richardson, Kristen Barbacci, Stubbs and Zobitne |
| 3:2010cv01456 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
244
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/14/2015. (km)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs motions to compel (Docs. 138 , 140 ), and for appointment of counsel, (Doc. 147 ), are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 18, 2013. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the Courts order denying leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 114) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on December 11, 2012. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and motion to serve Marcie Boyer, (Docs. 105 and 106 .) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 24, 2012. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court is directed to serve plaintiff's amended complaint on Phil Richardson inaccordance with F.R.C.P. 4. Mr. Richardson is requested to waive service pursuant to Rule 4(d). If plaint iff seeks to substitute Marcy Boyer for the JaneDoe defendant named in the amended complaint, he must file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) and Rule 15(c) within 20 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser on 7/31/12. (rc)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson; ; denying 77 Motion to Stay; denying 78 Motion for Sanctions: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 92) is ADO PTED. (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Stay (Doc. 77) and the Defendants Motion for Sanctions of Dismissal (Doc. 78) are DENIED.(3) This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for a determination of whether other, lesser sanctions are appropriate here.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/25/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 80 MOTION For Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 2, 2012. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1)The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.(2)Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Palakovich and Zobitne are DISMISSED. Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint against these Defendants. (3)Plaintiffs medical malpractice claims against the Medical Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with Pa. R. Civ. P. 1042.3.(4) This matter is RECOMMITTED to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/25/11. (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
