Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Marcus Brooking v. Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 23-2445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant / Appellee:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT CAMP HILL SCI, MS. ZOBITNE, (UNIT MANAGER A-BLOCK), CO HARRISON, (A-BLOCK) and others
Graziano v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Edward Graziano
Defendant:
John Wetzel, George Little, Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tierno v. Harry et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Defendant:
Laurel R. Harry, Renee Zobitne, John and Jane Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
William Tierno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramble v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2020cv02394
Defendant:
Bernard Panasiewicz, Keith Carberry, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
John Bramble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Sci-Camp Hill (Prison) et al
as 1:2020cv00523
Defendant:
SCI-Camp Hill Staff, Sci-Camp Hill (Prison), Keith Carberry and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driggers v. DOC SCI-Camp Hill et al
as 3:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Bernard Panasiewicz, Dr. Elicia Stein, Keith Carberry and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Driggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sewell v. D.O.C. SCI - Camp Hill et al
as 1:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Bernard Panasiewicz, Deb Alvord, Dr. Elicia Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Sewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Tedesco v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 19-1813
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and ZOBITNE, SCI Camp Hill
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN TEDESCO
Tedesco v. Link et al
as 3:2017cv00997
Plaintiff:
John Tedesco
Defendant:
Cynthia Link, Laurel Harry and Zobitne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa-Diaz v. Harry et al
as 1:2016cv02303
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rosa-Diaz
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Diana Woodside, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
