Ash v. D.O.C. et al
Plaintiff: William A Ash
Defendant: D.O.C., John E. Wetzel, Cynthia Link, Larry Mahally, Prince, Lea Martin, Jon Doe and Jane Doe
Case Number: 3:2017cv00957
Filed: June 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: PT
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Mr. Ashs motion 58 is DENIED without prejudice. 2. Mr. Ash shall respond to the Defendants motions for summary judgment by Monday, April 20, 2020. 3. Mr. Ashs failure to oppose Defend ants motions for summary judgment will result in the Court deeming the motions unopposed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).4. Defendants may file a reply brief within fourteen (14) days of receipt of Mr. Ashs opposition materials. 5. No further briefs may b e filed without leave of court. 6. Mr. Ash is reminded of his obligation to inform the Court of his address changes. If the Court is unable to communicate with him due to his failure to provide a current address, the Court will deem Mr. Ash to have abandoned his lawsuit. (ECF No. 5.)Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/13/20. (dw)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying 44 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/28/2019 (bg)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Dr. Prince's Motion to Dismiss 33 is DENIED. Dr. Prince shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/9/19. (dw)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. The Clerk of Court shall SEVER the following Defendants and all claims plead against them in Mr. Ashs Second Amended Complaint from this action: Secretary John Wetzel; SCI-Graterford Su perintendent Cynthia Link; John Doe Bus Driver; John Doe SCI-Graterford Correctional Officer (CO); and John Doe SCI-Graterford Medical Provider. 2. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER the severed Defendants and claims, and a copy of Mr. Ashs Second Ame nded Complaint (ECF No. 18), to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania forfurther consideration. 3. This Court shall maintain jurisdiction over the Eighth Amendment claims asserted against the following SCI Dallas Defendants: Superintendent Larry Mahally; Medical Director Doctor Prince; and MedicalAdministrator Lea Martin.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/23/18. (dw)
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) (PLEASE SEE MEMORANDUM FOR COMPLETE DETAILS). Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/2/18. (lh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ash v. D.O.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William A Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.O.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Link
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Mahally
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lea Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?