WHITNEY v. WETZEL et al
| CHARLES WHITNEY |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, RHONDA HOUSE, GATES, S. NICKELSON, CARL E. WALKER, TREPPET, CHUCK BYERS, BUZAS, B. PARSONS, T. BERIER, MICHAEL OPPMAN, LINDERMAN, CLARK, VORPAL, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 3, JOHN DOE, 4, JOHN DOE, 5 and SWITZER |
| 2:2012cv01623 |
| November 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Centre |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 73 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 102 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 73 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77 ) is DENIED.It is further ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 102 ) dated July 6, 2015, is ADOPTED, as the opinion of the Court, as supplemented by the memorandum opinion accompanying this order. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/12/2015. (smc)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 91 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by CHARLES WHITNEY. Court staff mailed a copy of this docket entry and the opinion and order to plaintiff at his address of record on this date. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/4/2014. (ten)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 72 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by CHARLES WHITNEY. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/31/2014. (blr)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 4/1/2014. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss as follows: (a) The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims under the First Amendment that his privileged mail was improperly opened;(b) The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Defendants' request to dismiss Defendants Wetzel, House, Switzer, Linderman, and Oppman based on lack of personal knowledge; (c) The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment Retaliation claim, his Eighth Amend ment conditions of confinement claim, and his Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim. (d) The Motion is DENIED with respect to Defendants request to dismiss Defendant Coleman. It is further ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. [37 ]) dated August 21, 2013, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court, as supplemented by the memorandum opinion ((ECF No. 40 ). It is further ORDERED that the remaining Defendants shall file a responsive pleading in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(4)(A). It is further ORDERED that this matter is remanded back to the magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/24/2013. (smc )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
