Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Clark v. WinRed Technical Services, LLC
as 2:2026cv03755
Defendant:
WinRed Technical Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Austin Clark
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clark v. Stoudt
as 1:2026cv02060
Respondent:
Paula Stoudt
Petitioner:
Andrew Clark, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Heartman et al
as 3:2026cv00867
Defendant:
Benu Clark and Robert Heartman
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meador v. Laughlin Township et al
as 2:2026cv03674
Defendant:
Clark County Justice Court and Laughlin Township
Plaintiff:
Michael Meador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abercrombie et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01520
Defendant:
Lake Shore Obstetrics and Gynecology, L.L.C., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, Pharmacia LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Candalece Elaine Coleman-Lambert, Fantase Coleman, Tamera Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Scott et al
as 1:2026cv03680
Defendant:
Harold Clark and Scott
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00216
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 3:2026cv00934
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Francom et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01422
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Katrina Bears, Sarah Ervin, John Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
