Cases 1 - 10 of 1,713
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Timikia N. Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams et al v. Gharib et al
as 1:2024cv09378
Plaintiff:
Michele Irene Arauz Castillo, James Adams, Claire Brynycz and others
Defendant:
Guillermo Gharib, Ashley Harris, Cyrus Abrahim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Clarke v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01212
Defendant:
CO H, John Doe #6, Sgt. P and others
Plaintiff:
Jamahl Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01486
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark v. Yehl
as 6:2024cv06709
Respondent:
Christopher Yehl
Petitioner:
Omar Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark
as 1:2024cv01152
Petitioner:
Omar Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. City of Niagara Falls New York et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Defendant:
Kevin Maluchnik, Brian Seaman, Richard Fleck and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zeitlin v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 1:2024cv08085
Plaintiff:
Bruni Zeitlin
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv01409
Defendant:
John Doe #1 through John Doe #12, Ondrea M. Clark and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
