ASHFORD v. HAWKINBERRY et al
| AILEAF ASHFORD |
| ROBERT HAWKINBERRY, PARKER, WORKMAN, LOWTHER, RICHTER, PLETCHER, FRIEND, ASHLEY COTTON, DONGILLI, PELLIS, EGROS, DISALVA, GARLAND, HALEY, NEWMAN, MCKNIGHT, TANNER, BRIAN COLEMAN and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2014cv01718 |
| December 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Forest |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 128 is denied and Defendants' motion for summary judgment 136 is denied in part and granted in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 09/26/2017. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 MOTION for Leave to Obtain Oral Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/13/2016. (jlh)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 65 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by BRIAN COLEMAN, GARLAND, EGROS, PLETCHER, PARKER, PELLIS, BRIAN TANNER, ERIC B. PORTER, RICHTER, HALEY, NEWMAN, DONGILLI, LOWTHER, WORKMAN, DISALVA, ASHLEY COTTON, FRIEND, FORTE, ROBERT HAWKINBERRY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/2/2016. (jlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
