Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plintron Technologies USA LLC v. Phillips et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plintron Technologies USA LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Phillips, Richard Pelly, Thomas Mathew and others
CHAVEZ et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
ALICIA CHAVEZ, CHARLES LEWIS, DOROTHY WILLIS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Michael Pellis Architecture PLC v. M.L. Bell Construction LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Michael Pellis Architecture PLC
Defendant:
M.L. Bell Construction LLC and Michael F. Bell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pellis v. Hochul et al
as 6:2022cv06177
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Pellis
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PELLIS v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv16651
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PELLIS
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Pelly et al v. Fields
as 8:2019cv01722
Defendant:
Mr. Jeremy Alan Fields and Jeremy Alan Fields
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Sharon K. Pelly, Mr. Goffery Pelly, Goffery Pelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pellis v. Chappius
as 1:2019cv00149
Respondent:
Paul Chappius, Jr.
Petitioner:
Charles M. Pellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2018cv04691
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Neal Pellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Robert A. Cotton v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv02343
Defendant:
Lt. Pellis, Jean Shiomoto, County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
