TUSTIN v. STRAWN et al
| MICHAEL LEE TUSTIN |
| C.O. FREIDL, MIS G. MCGAVITT, DEPUTY WARDEN WAUGH, C.O. JORDAN, CAPT. LEHR, CRAMER, MAJOR CODDINGTON, DEPUTY WARDEN CAIN, CAPT. LEECH, WARDEN STRAWN, C.O. SISCO, C.O. DAVIS and DEVON |
| 2:2019cv00006 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM and ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. Plaintiff failed to submit a complete in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), (2). Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/3/2019. (sms) |
| Filing 2 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/3/2019. (sms) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL LEE TUSTIN. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP motion, #2 Consent to Magistrate Judge or District Judge Option, #3 Envelope) (ept) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/3/2019) (sms) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/3/2019: #4 Authorization by Prisoner) (sms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
