Cases 1 - 10 of 10
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
DAY-HARRIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRIS and QUINCY DAY-HARRIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Booth
as 22-978
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kevin Thompson, AKA James Moore
Defendant:
RN Charlotte Peterson, CO Salerno, MD Hill and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sgt. Troy Booth
Moore v. Sgt. Armstrong et al
as 3:2019cv00698
Defendant:
Sgt. Armstrong, C.O. Edwards and C.O. Jordan
Plaintiff:
Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUSTIN v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
C.O. FREIDL, MIS G. MCGAVITT, DEPUTY WARDEN WAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE TUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TUSTIN v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE TUSTIN
Defendant:
DONALD WAUGH, DEPUTY WARDEN CANIE, EDWARD STRAWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
Williams v. Jordan
as 1:2011cv03682
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
C.O. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchie v. Hulihan et al
as 9:2008cv00706
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
William Hulihan, Karen Phillips, David Wiernickie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
