Cases 1 - 10 of 24
STOCKTON v. WALKER et al
as 2:2026cv01018
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
Superintendent T. WALKER, M. TKACS, Deputy SWITZER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFRIES v. C.O. CAVALARI et al
as 2:2026cv03478
Plaintiff:
RICARDO ANTHONY JEFFRIES, SR.
Defendant:
C.O. CAVALARI, C.O. RIENECKER, C.O. PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Mendez et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randal B. McCoy
Defendant:
Dr. Mendez, Nurse Craft, Nurse Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Ryburn v. C. O. Moore, et al
as 24-1261
Plaintiff:
THOMAS V. RYBURN
Defendant:
C.O. MOORE and C.O. DAVIS
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Swaney et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Lujan
Defendant:
Warden Swaney, Lt. J. Todd, C.O. Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. McIntyre et al
as 9:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Joe McIntyre, J. Spence, Sergeant Congregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Stokes et al
as 1:2022cv07142
Plaintiff:
Rodney Black
Defendant:
Dr Sam Stokes, Dr Meyers, N.P. Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryburn v. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv06608
Plaintiff:
Thomas V. Ryburn
Defendant:
C O Moore, C.O. Davis, Unknown C.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLain v. Howard et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray McLain
Defendant:
Catricia Howard, Michaeleen Powanda, J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
