Palmigiano v. Department of Corrections et al
Department of Corrections and State of Rhode Island |
Nicholas Palmigiano, William O'Brien, Eric Day, John F. Pierce, Mark Geisser and William Thomas |
1:1974cv00172 |
January 11, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Jacob Hagopian |
Ronald R Lagueux |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 118 ORDER granting 109 Motion to Dismiss; denying 102 Motion to Intervene; denying 103 Motion to Adjudge in Contempt; denying 104 MOTION Appoint Successor Class Counsel. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 10/20/2023. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This Court receives frequent requests (principally from present inmates of Rhode Island's Adult Correctional Institutions - "ACI") to reopen the above-captioned matters. With this Memorandum and Order the Court intends to close these matters, finally and completely. So Ordered by Senior Judge Ronald R. Lagueux on 2/19/14. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula) |
Filing 88 ORDER denying 85 Motion to Vacate filed by Parrish Chase. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacob Hagopian on 11/24/09. (Gilfillan, Barbara) |
Filing 82 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 76 Motion Intervene, denying 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 77 Motion to Adjudge in Contempt. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacob Hagopian on 2/17/09. (Gilfillan, Barbara) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.