Pardee, et al v. Consumer Services
| Jonathan H. Pardee and Carol Havican |
| Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc |
| Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc |
| Jonathan H. Pardee, Dunbar/Wheeler Trust, Ogden H. Sutro and Jonathan H. Pardee Charitable Remainder Trust |
| William L. Winslow |
| 1:2001cv00594 |
| December 17, 2001 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| Lincoln D. Almond |
| Ronald R Lagueux |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
270
DECISION AND ORDER denying 244 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 253 Motion for Summary Judgment and grants plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on defendant's counterclaims. The Court dismisses the counterclaims against Count erclaim Defendants Sutro and Dunbar/Wheeler Trust. This ruling is limited to the issue of liability only. The Court will issue a scheduling order concerning the issue of damages and set a date for a jury trial on that issue. No judgment to issue until all issues are resolved. So Ordered by Senior Judge Ronald R. Lagueux on 2/13/13. (Cavaco, Janice)
|
|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 204 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Craig M. Scott terminated. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 1/28/09. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
