Falcone v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
| 1:2006cv00363 |
| August 10, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Lincoln D. Almond |
| Ernest C. Torres |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 46 Report and Recommendation; granting 43 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 44 Motion to Dismiss; - So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M Lisi on 8/6/09. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 44 MOTION to Dismiss Count I of the Defendant's Counterclaim filed by Option One Mortgage Corporation, 43 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by South County Mortgage Corporation. Recommending the Motions be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 8/4/2009. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 7/21/09. (Saucier, Martha)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 34 Motion for Default Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Ernest C. Torres on 9/18/08. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Falcone v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
