Toro v. Wall et al
| Edson Toro |
| Ashbel T. Wall and R.I. Parole Board |
| 1:2008cv00118 |
| March 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Providence |
| Lincoln D. Almond |
| William E Smith |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 31 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The ACI shall forward to the Clerk of the Court subsequent monthly payments of twenty percent (20%) of Petitioners preceding months income each time Petitioners account balance exceeds $10.00. Such fees shall be forwarded until the filing fee of $455.00 has been paid in full. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 11/24/08. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge William E Smith on 9/23/2008. (Geile, Wendy)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the State's Motion to Dismiss be Granted, and that the Petition be Dismissed With Prejudice 6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus filed by Ashbel T. Wall Objections to R&R due by 9/23/2008. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/9/08. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
